Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:18
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Prediction: Nvidia Will Beat the Market. Here's Why - The Motley Fool
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Midea is recalling its U-shaped air conditioners because of potential mold growth - The Verge
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What is your review of the Redmi 9A? Is it worth buying?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are the most significant instances of romantic jealousy in the Harry Potter series?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Have you ever had a bad gut feeling about someone and it was right?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The influencer whose tweet led to a ban on disposable vapes - BBC
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?